When sourcing or manufacturing EMI/RFI shielding components such as fingerstock gaskets, spring contacts, and shield door assemblies, material selection is arguably the most critical technical decision. Stainless steel has emerged as a preferred material for these applications due to its combination of electrical conductivity, mechanical resilience, and corrosion resistance. However, not all stainless steel is created equal - and the difference between grades can mean the difference between a product that lasts 3 years versus 25 years in the field.
The two most commonly specified grades for EMI/RFI shielding applications are SS304 and SS316. Both belong to the 300-series austenitic stainless steel family, but their chemical compositions and performance characteristics differ in ways that directly impact total cost of ownership for B2B buyers.
SS304 vs SS316: Chemical Composition and Key Properties
| Property | SS304 (18/8 Stainless) | SS316 (Marine Grade) | Performance Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chromium (Cr) | 17.5-19.5% | 16.5-18.5% | Both provide excellent oxidation resistance |
| Nickel (Ni) | 8.0-10.5% | 10.0-13.0% | 316 has higher nickel for enhanced corrosion resistance |
| Molybdenum (Mo) | 0% | 2.0-2.5% | Key differentiator - Mo dramatically improves chloride resistance |
| Carbon (C) | ≤0.08% | ≤0.08% | Standard grades; 304L/316L variants have ≤0.03% |
| Tensile Strength | 515 MPa (min) | 515 MPa (min) | Mechanical strength essentially identical |
| Yield Strength | 205 MPa (min) | 205 MPa (min) | Similar structural performance |
| Elongation | 40% (min) | 40% (min) | Comparable formability for fingerstock manufacturing |
| Magnetic Permeability | Low (austenitic) | Low (austenitic) | Critical for EMI/RFI applications - both suitable |
| Relative Cost (2026) | Baseline ($2.50-3.50/kg) | +30-50% premium ($3.50-5.00/kg) | Mo content is primary cost driver [3] |
The presence of molybdenum in SS316 is the single most important differentiator. This alloying element, which trades at USD 20-24 per pound in 2026, provides dramatically improved resistance to pitting and crevice corrosion in chloride-containing environments. For EMI/RFI shielding components deployed in coastal facilities, chemical processing plants, marine vessels, or outdoor telecommunications infrastructure, this can be the difference between catastrophic failure and decades of reliable service.
For my company it's often not about the corrosion resistance, but the magnetic permeability and long-term resistance to becoming magnetized. We have sensitive electromagnetic sensors that require materials with stable non-magnetic properties over time. [7]
This Reddit comment from an engineer in the CNC machining community highlights a critical but often overlooked consideration: magnetic permeability stability. While both 304 and 316 are nominally non-magnetic in their annealed state, cold working (such as the stamping and forming processes used to manufacture fingerstock gaskets) can induce some magnetism. For applications involving sensitive electromagnetic sensors - such as MRI shield rooms, scientific instrumentation, or military communications equipment - this becomes a specification requirement that transcends simple corrosion resistance.

