When sourcing industrial robots on Alibaba.com, one of the most critical specifications you'll encounter is precision—typically expressed as a ±value in millimeters. However, there's a fundamental distinction that many buyers overlook: repeatability is not the same as accuracy. This confusion can lead to mismatched expectations and production quality issues down the line.
Accuracy refers to how closely a robot can reach a commanded target position. If you instruct the robot to move to coordinate XYZ, accuracy measures the error between where you told it to go and where it actually arrives. Repeatability, on the other hand, measures consistency—how closely the robot returns to the same position when repeating the same motion under identical conditions.
If you see a figure like for example 0.2mm, that actually means given the same payload and the same motion profile the end effector will arrive within 0.2mm of the previous run position. It does NOT mean if I direct the robot end effector position to coordinate XYZ it will arrive to within 0.2mm of that position [6].
If you see a figure like for example 0.2mm, that actually means given the same payload and the same motion profile the end effector will arrive within 0.2mm of the previous run position. It does NOT mean if I direct the robot end effector position to coordinate XYZ it will arrive to within 0.2mm of that position [6].
This distinction matters because manufacturers typically guarantee repeatability, not accuracy. As one industry professional noted on Reddit, manufacturers quote impressive repeatability numbers prominently, but you have to dig deep to find linearity and circular path accuracy data [7]. This isn't necessarily deceptive—it's standard industry practice—but buyers need to understand what they're actually purchasing.

