When sourcing stainless steel products on Alibaba.com, understanding surface finish standards is critical for making informed procurement decisions. The industry uses standardized numbering systems (No. 1 through No. 8) defined by ASTM A480 and ISO 4287 to classify different finish types, each with distinct characteristics, manufacturing processes, and application suitability.
Stainless Steel Finish Grade Comparison (No. 1 to No. 8)
| Finish Grade | Surface Description | Ra Value (μm) | Common Applications | Relative Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. 1 (Hot Rolled Annealed) | Rough dull surface, mill scale removed | 3.2-6.3 | Industrial equipment, non-decorative | Base |
| 2D (Cold Rolled Dull) | Matte silver-gray, low reflectivity | 0.8-1.6 | Chemical tanks, industrial parts | Base +5% |
| 2B (Cold Rolled Bright) | Smooth bright surface, most common | 0.4-0.8 | General purpose, food processing | Base +10% |
| No. 3 (Coarse Polish) | Medium reflectivity, visible grit lines | 0.4-0.6 | Food processing equipment | Base +25% |
| No. 4 (Brushed/Satin) | Directional grain pattern, most popular | 0.2-0.6 | Architecture, elevators, hospitals, kitchens | Base +30% |
| No. 6 (Satin Polish) | Softer satin finish, less reflective than No. 4 | 0.2-0.4 | Decorative trim, architectural | Base +40% |
| No. 7 (High Reflective) | Highly reflective, faint grit lines visible | 0.1-0.2 | Decorative panels, signage | Base +45% |
| No. 8 (Mirror Polish) | Highest reflectivity, ASTM mirror standard | ≤0.1 | Food service, medical, luxury decor | Base +50% |
Key Industry Insight: The No. 4 brushed finish dominates commercial applications, particularly in architecture, elevators, and healthcare facilities. This popularity stems from its optimal balance of aesthetics, durability, and cost-effectiveness. The directional grain pattern effectively conceals minor scratches and fingerprints, making it ideal for high-traffic areas where maintenance frequency is a concern.

