Surface roughness is the foundational metric for evaluating polished finishes in industrial manufacturing. The most common measurement is Ra (Roughness Average), expressed in micrometers (μm) or microinches (μin). This single number represents the average deviation of surface peaks and valleys from the mean line - lower Ra values indicate smoother surfaces.
Surface Roughness Comparison Chart - Ra Values and Applications
| Finish Type | Ra Range (μm) | Ra Range (μin) | Typical Applications | Relative Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirror Polished | 0.05 - 0.4 | 2 - 16 | Optical components, premium eyewear, decorative trim, medical devices | Very High |
| Fine Polished | 0.4 - 0.8 | 16 - 32 | Automotive trim, food processing equipment, high-end consumer goods | High |
| Smooth Machined | 0.8 - 1.6 | 32 - 63 | Precision mechanical parts, hydraulic components | Medium |
| Standard Machined | 1.6 - 3.2 | 63 - 125 | General industrial parts, structural components | Low |
| As-Fabricated | 3.2 - 12.5 | 125 - 500 | Non-critical structural parts, raw stock | Lowest |
The relationship between surface roughness and cost is non-linear. Moving from Ra 3.2μm to Ra 1.6μm might add 20-30% to production costs, but going from Ra 0.8μm to Ra 0.4μm can double or triple costs due to the need for specialized equipment, additional polishing stages, and stricter quality inspection protocols.
I know you didn't ask this, but the way these symbols should be used is described in ISO 21920-1, and the Ra does not go there. The proper surface roughness annotation follows EN ISO 1302 standards with the Ra value positioned below the horizontal line in the surface texture symbol [4].

