One of the most common misconceptions among Southeast Asian exporters is confusing FCC certification with food safety compliance. Let's set the record straight with authoritative sources.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulates radio frequency devices in electronic-electrical products to prevent harmful interference. Their jurisdiction covers intentional radiators (devices designed to emit RF energy like Wi-Fi routers) and unintentional radiators (devices that generate RF as a byproduct like computers). Food products, including dried fruit, fall completely outside FCC's regulatory scope [1][5].
Any electronic device marketed or sold in the US must have FCC approval. The FCC regulates electronic devices to ensure they don't cause harmful radio frequency interference. This applies to intentional and unintentional radiators [5].
SGS, one of the world's leading inspection and certification companies, confirms: FCC approval is mandatory for electronic devices only. The certification process involves equipment authorization under 47 CFR part 2, with different routes for different product types (SDoC for unintentional radiators, Certification for intentional radiators) [5]. Dried fruit exporters should not pursue FCC certification - it's irrelevant to food products and would be a waste of resources.
Compliance Testing, a leading certification consultancy, further clarifies that FCC certification is required for electronic devices that oscillate above 9kHz, including Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and wireless devices. Food products are explicitly exempt from FCC requirements [9].
So what certifications DO dried fruit exporters need for the US market? The answer lies with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and food safety management systems like HACCP.

